If our country wasn’t currently imploding, we would be about two months into baseball season at this point. Instead of watching people argue on Twitter about coronavirus, racism, or the upcoming election, it should be ME getting into Twitter fights. I’d be defending Gary Sanchez to Yankee fans trying to trade him after a three strikeout game, or battling an Astros fan who still tries to claim “everyone was cheating.” Maybe I’d even be having a nice argument with a Mets fan about how Aaron Judge is clearly better than Pete Alonso, while still admitting that Jacob deGrom is the superior pitcher to Gerrit Cole.Continue reading Yankees/Mets All-Time Crossover Lineup
The venerable “Below the Belt Sports Blog” editor, Nick Costanzo, recently wrote a great post in which he listed the Yankees’ all-time “Past Their Prime” team. I think it was a brilliant idea, so, as a Mets fan, I have decided to do the comparable for the Mets. Continue reading Mets’ All-Time “Past Their Prime” Team
On Wednesday night, Jacob deGrom pitched seven dominant shutout innings, striking out 14 Marlins, en route to a Mets victory. When it was time for Mets manager Mickey Callaway to reach into the bullpen in the Bottom of the 8th Inning, New York held a 6-0 lead. The first reliever on whom Callaway called was journeyman southpaw Luis Avilan.
If there is one thing guys will always be romantic about, it is baseball. I’ll be the first to admit it’s difficult to really express emotions about real life stuff, like those you care about and your deepest passions. But when it comes to a bat, a ball, and some expensive hot dogs on a summer day, I’ll scream my thoughts from the nosebleeds to whoever is listening.
There’s a few particular days where those emotions run high. Any Game 7, Yankees vs Red Sox/Mets (or any rivalry game for other fans), certain player’s final game, and of course, Opening Day.
And in case you live under a rock, today is Opening Day. I know this Sandlot scene is about July 4th and baseball, but I still feel it captures the beauty of baseball and the awe we absorb when the game comes around.
With that said, there are a few matchups that I think fans should be looking at today if they want to watch some good baseball:
Before I address the title of this article, please allow me a bit of preamble.
You might have seen the OBJ trade coming, but I did not. Yes, there were trade rumors about Beckham at various times over the past two years, but, during this offseason, there was no considerable buzz about such a trade being a legitimate possibility. Therefore, my brain is still processing the trade. Do I like this trade or not? I honestly do not know.
I could not care less about February baseball injuries. (Side note: I cannot stand when people say “I could care less” when they mean “I could not care less”.) Allow me to repeat myself. I could not care less about February baseball injuries.
I make this point because it is apparently a huge story that Mets’ infielder Jed Lowrie is heading for an MRI for soreness in the back of his knee. Notice that today’s date is February 24. The Mets’ first regular-season game takes place on March 28. Thus, we are five weeks from the start of the regular season. Do I care that Jed Lowrie might miss a few weeks of Spring Training? Of course not. As I have discussed in the past, I could not care less about preseason games in any sport. My main goal for any preseason is to have all of my team’s players be healthy when the regular season starts.
A few weeks ago, Jacob deGrom captured the National League Cy Young Award. As a Mets fan, I was very excited to have him win this well-deserved honor. However, deGrom ruined a perfect moment with the following statement.
“I want to thank the Baseball Writers for this honor. I’m extremely humbled to win this award along with some other great former Mets such as Tom Seaver, Dwight Gooden and R.A. Dickey. I’d especially like to thank my teammates, coaching staff and my family.”
This statement shows that deGrom is just another in a long line of athletes who do not know the meaning of the word “humbled”, and frankly I am sick of it. Tom Seaver is one of the greatest pitchers of all time; Dwight Gooden won a Cy Young Award in one of the greatest single seasons by any pitcher; and R.A. Dickey was beloved by Mets fans. Thus, there are many words to describe how I would feel if I joined that esteemed list:
“Flattered”, “honored”, “amazing”, “The Man”, The Sh!t” are the first five things that come to mind. “Humbled” falls at Spot #1,948,345 in the list of ways I would feel if I won the Cy Young Award and were put on that list of great pitchers. The top synonyms for “humbled” are “defeated”, “beaten”, “crushed”, “humiliated”, “degraded”, and “shamed”. If you win the Cy Young Award and feel any of those six emotions, please seek a mental-health professional help immediately because you should be feeling your best at a time of such high honor.
Unfortunately, deGrom is just one of many athletes who misuse the word “humbled”. We hear it all the time. NBA players are humbled when they are compared to Larry Bird or Magic Johnson, and quarterback are humbled when they are compared to Joe Montana and Tom Brady. Stop it. Some people absolutely need to be able to used the word “humbled”, and the word does not work if others are using the word inappropriately. Here are two athletes who reserve the right to say “humbled”:
- Matt Harvey: The guy was “The Dark Knight” and was being discussed along the lines of Tom Seaver and Dwight Gooden. He was sleeping with supermodels and was the big man about town in New York City. Then, a few minutes later; the guy was pitching to an ERA near 7, then pitching out of the bullpen; and then pitching in Cincinnati. Three years ago, he thought he would someday earn the biggest contract in history for an MLB pitcher. Now, he is hoping to earn a contract of any kind. Now, that is humbling.
- Aaron Williams (7 Days in Hell): The guy was the top tennis player in the world. An announcer stated during Williams’s prime, “There is no one in the world who does not want to have sex with Aaron Williams.” The guy was unbeatable on the court until an unfortunate day at Wimbledon. On that day, he accidentally killed a spectator with a serve before shoving a member of the English royal family. This started a downward spiral that ultimately ended up with Williams serving time in a Swedish prison. Again, that is humbling. (Bonus points: Andy Samberg’s character in Popstar debuted a song called “Humble” in which he appropriately yet ironically uses the word “humble”.)
Thus, Jacob deGrom, you have not been humbled. If you go out there next year and pitch to an ERA of 5.00, you may say that you are humbled. If you get knocked out of a game after allowing 10 runs in the first inning, you may say that you are humbled. If your agent-turned-GM refuses you a long-term extension and compares you to 2017 Tyler Clippard, 2005 Carl Pavano, and 1998 Mel Rojas; you may say that you are humbled. Lastly, if your wife leaves you for the bass player from Nickelback on the same day that your dog sets your house on fire, you may say that you are humbled.
However, 2018 National League Cy Young Award Winner, Jacob deGrom, as we stand here today, you have not been humbled. Congratulations though. It was an absolute delight to watch one of the most incredible pitching seasons I have ever seen.
David Wright has technically been a New York Met since 2004, but he has not played in a Major League game since May of 2016. For many years, Wright was one of the better third basemen in Major League Baseball, but, ironically, I am currently the most excited I have ever been about David Wright.
On most days since April of 2015, I have assumed that David Wright’s MLB career was finished. Wright found himself on the DL eight days into the Mets’ 2015 season. During that DL stint, we learned that Wright had been diagnosed with spinal stenosis. As the Mets acquired Yoenis Cespedes on July 31 and went on a tear in August, David Wright had become an afterthought…albeit an afterthought of “His career might be over.” Then, lo and behold, Wright returned in late August and was the Mets’ regular third baseman en route to the World Series.
However, after David hit .185 (10 for 54) in the 2015 postseason, I hoped he would retire. I figured that he had a signature moment – a homerun in the first World Series game ever played at Citi Field – but that his body would not allow him to play Major League Baseball at a high level any longer. Spinal stenosis is a debilitating condition, and I considered his on-field time from late August through November 1 of 2015 should be his swan song. Had he retired after the 2015 season, the Mets would have ensured that there would be no awkward situation in which the Mets would have to decide between playing a broken-down David Wright or a better player at third base. I did not want to see Wright end up in a position where he guts out 40 games per season at a .200 batting average, as fans clamor to see a journeyman .260 hitter start over him. That would have been awkward for all of us, and I wanted no part of it.
Well, interestingly enough, Wright did not retire after 2015….but my fear did not play out either. In 2016, Wright was hitting .226 with 7 homers when he went on the DL over Memorial Day Weekend. Since then, he has never been on the active Mets roster. As he has battled major neck and shoulder problems (on top of the spinal-stenosis back problems), he has become the ultimate afterthought in terms of the present-day Mets. Until the past week or two, most of us have thought of David Wright’s Mets career in past tense. Sure, in 2017, Jose Reyes (who served as the Mets’ primary third baseman for much of the season) said all the right things (no pun intended) about keeping the seat warm for Wright. Those two have such a strong friendship, dating back to 2003-4, and any good friend believes the best in his or her friends. However, in the case of Wright being the Mets’ everyday third baseman, it was wishful thinking on Reyes’s part….and every Mets fan knew it.
Fast forward to 2018 when the Mets signed Todd Frazier to the Mets’ third baseman, and nobody was worrying that the Mets had given away Wright’s position. Wright was done. His career was in the past. We would occasionally hear about him having light workouts or having catches with people. Woop-dee-doo. I do not care about that stuff for guys on the 10-day DL; I did not care with Wright either. That said, all of a sudden, a few weeks ago, Wright actually began playing in rehab games in Port St. Lucie. I do not generally care about that stuff either, but, given Wright’s situation, I was interested. Honestly, I had never thought he would make it back this far.
Now, as I sit here on September 13, I see a player who has not played in more than 2.5 seasons but has worked through incredibly painful and debilitating injuries to try to get back on the field. How often do we see players, especially those in their mid-30s, return after that much time off? I know that Wright is coming back for only one or a few games before retiring, but it remains quite a feat. It would have been very easy at any time since early 2015 for Wright to retire. Sure, the money he is making is a good motivator to try to play again, but I do not care. Especially since Wright went down “for good” in May 2016, he has to have known that; if he were ever to return to the Majors, he would be a shell of what he once was. He has to have known that he has had very few MLB games left in him….but that does not matter to him. Many players would not have fought back for more than 2.5 years like Wright has. Wright just wants to play on an MLB field one more time, and he will have that opportunity on the Mets. That is a great story.
The funny thing is that, until now, David Wright never truly excited me as a Met. When Wright had his best seasons from 2005 through 2008, I was always more excited by Jose Reyes, Carlos Beltran, and Carlos Delgado. Wright was a great player, but I felt that those three were the true stars. Unfortunately, as those players left, Wright stepped down from “Great” to “Very Good”. During those “very good” years of 2009 through 2014, the Mets were not very good. By 2015, when the Mets finally made it to a World Series with Wright, the stars had become the pitchers and Cespedes. Therefore, for one reason or another, David Wright had never excited me….until now.
Yes, David Wright is one of the best people in baseball. He is a good-looking guy, and he has been a great face for the Mets’ franchise. He is one of the few pro athletes who can legitimately be a role model for kids. However, his dedication to work his way back to the majors makes him more of a role model than ever. For the first time in David Wright’s career, I am excited to watch him play. He might end up playing only three games or two games or one game. That does not matter to me. It will be very emotional to see him return to the Mets’ lineup, and I am excited to see #5 play third base for the Mets at least one more time.
As you likely know, Mets pitcher Jacob deGrom is in the midst of an epic season in which he has a .97 WHIP, 1.85 ERA, and 173 strikeouts in 22 starts (one of which he left after one inning, due to rain/injury). This has put him in a tight race with the Nationals’ Max Scherzer for the National League Cy Young Award. Of course, I should also mention that deGrom has all of 5 wins (5-7 record) this season. Thus, he is on pace to earn a total of 7 or 8 wins. Even if one looks at the Mets’ team record in deGrom’s starts (which leads into my view on how MLB should change its wins stat), one will see a sub-.500 record for deGrom and the Mets.
As a result of all this, what course of events over the next eight weeks would be most optimal for both deGrom’s Cy Young candidacy and his legacy? I believe the best result for him would be to endure more of the same stuff that has happened for the first four-plus months of this season: more and more outings in which deGrom earns a loss while pitching 7 or 8 innings of 1-run ball. While that would be bad for the Mets overall, it would be the best thing that could happen to deGrom. Hear me out here…
Max Scherzer has 15 wins this season and is a safe bet to reach 20. If deGrom maintains his own current pace toward 7 or 8 wins, Scherzer will destroy deGrom in the “Wins” department. This occurrence would prop up the vitality of the “Poor poor Jacob deGrom” storyline. Cy Young voters would likely ignore the “Wins” totals altogether. The stat is already of waning importance to voters, and voters would use the 12-13-win gap between Scherzer and deGrom to a) provide the ultimate proof that the “Wins” stat is silly and b) stamp deGrom’s 2018 season as the ultimate “dominant season on a terrible team”. As long as deGrom maintains his strong ERA edge and beats or comes close to Scherzer in strikeouts, Jake should earn the Cy Young Award with the help of the two aforementioned thoughts of voters.
What happens though if the Mets somehow bring deGrom 8 wins between now and the end of the season? I know that a team regularly starting Jose Reyes, Jose Bautista, and Wilmer Flores is unlikely to win 8 games period the rest of the season, but let us play “What if?” anyway. In this hypothetical situation, deGrom would end the season with 13 wins. That sounds good at first thought, but deGrom would now have a win total that is closer to representative of his 2018 performance. In actuality, he likely will have pitched well enough to have earned 20 wins with 26 of the 29 other offense/bullpen combinations in baseball. That said, the deGrom pity party would nevertheless be much smaller if he has 13 wins, compared to if he has 7 or 8 wins. The gap between 13 wins and Scherzer’s 20 wins is small enough to make the “Wins” mark a legitimate factor in the Cy Young voting. At the same time, Scherzer will have earned 7 more than deGrom. All of a sudden, many of deGrom’s pity votes will change to Scherzer votes as the “Wins” debate is ironically legitimized.
Meanwhile, if deGrom ends this season with 7 or 8 wins, baseball fans and writers will remember his season forever. Someday, when deGrom’s name appears on the Hall of Fame ballot, voters will be quick to add 12 wins to his career “Wins” total on the grounds of “He should have won 20 games in that legendary 2018 season”. This would be true even though many modern-day starters have great seasons that result in only 13 to 16 wins, due to lack of bullpen/offensive support. This is why, if deGrom actually makes it to 13 wins this year, future Hall of Fame voters will not “tack on any wins” when analyzing his career. Therefore, deGrom would lose out on “7 wins” in the minds of many voters, who would likely be overly generous in pretending an 8-win season is a 20-win season.
Anyway, this way of thinking might seem crazy to you, but it demonstrates one of the basic principles of life in the 21st Century. You are better off having extreme misery than minor inconvenience. Extreme misery sells, while nobody cares about minor inconveniences.
For example, would you rather give birth to triplets or octuplets? Well, first off, I give major props to the woman birthing either. That said, it is a lot of money and work to raise triplets. It should cost an exorbitant amount of money and work to raise octuplets, but you are also 90% likely to get your own TV show if you have octuplets. That TV show will give you a whole lot of money which will allow you can make ends meet. If you have 3 kids, nobody is giving you a TV show…or money. You have to take care of those three kids on your own. Therefore, it might indirectly become easier to raise octuplets than triplets.
Actually, this “extreme misery sells” concept is the whole premise of reality TV. As another example, Angelina showed up on Jersey Shore: Family Reunion this season looking like a complete mess. Not a big deal. Not super-memorable. However, she then had a “period-sh!t” on TV, and, all of a sudden, we were blessed with the most memorable moment of the season. Being a garden-variety complete mess was a minor inconvenience for Angelina, but I would like to think that having the entire world remember her as being “period-sh!t girl” is extreme misery….except for the fact that she has stayed much more relevant, famous, and (therefore) rich because of it. Extreme misery pays off.
Basically, this extreme misery is just “life tanking”. For years, the 76ers knew that they were not good enough to compete for NBA Championships, so Philly was better off losing to earn better draft picks. Now, the team is good and ready to compete for championships. Was Angelina really that different from the Sixers? Had Angelina been merely “normal-level trashy”, it would have been like having “only” triplets”, deGrom winning 13 games this year, or the Sixers churning out a few #8-seeds and non-lottery draft picks. Instead, Angelina showed that she could “trust the process” by doing the “period sh!t”, something that 99% of women would not want to do in front of even one other human, much less the whole country. The action was memorably disgusting but led her back to fame and money. Angelina was not going to use success to earn fame or fortune, so she tanked her way to fame and fortune.
Therefore, if the Mets want to earn deGrom a Cy Young Award and augment his Hall of Fame credentials, they should put the worst-possible lineups on the field every time deGrom makes a start. In other words, the Mets can continue doing EXACTLY what they have been doing for deGrom for four months, and deGrom will achieve his “extreme misery” and his Sixers/Angelina/Octomom payoff in the form of a Cy Young Award. Keep trusting the process, Jake and the Mets.
Like Michael Kay, I too do not like talking about whether or not people should be fired. It is tough for someone to lose his/her livelihood, and I do not like to go there. At the same time, I am OK discussing whether or not I think somebody WILL be fired. That brings us now to a discussion of the New York Mets’ manager. At this time, I would be completely shocked if Mickey Callaway returns to manage the Mets in 2019. I know that it seems harsh to fire a manager after only one year on the job, but there are three major reasons why I expect Callaway to be let go.
1) He is not a good manager: Let us start with the most obvious reason. The job of baseball manager has two main components – strategy and leadership. It would appear that Callaway struggles with both. In terms of strategy, there have been far too many times when Callaway has made indefensible decisions. I am not talking about leaving a starting pitcher in for one batter too many or one batter too few; I am also not talking about using his closer when he should not or using a non-closer when he should use his closer. We criticize all managers about these decisions any time said decisions do not work.
No, I am talking about the obvious mistakes. For example, in June, the Mets faced the Pirates at Citi Field. In the Top of the 9th with 2 outs; first base was open, and the Pirates’ closer Felipe Vazquez was on deck. It should have been a no-brainer to intentionally walk the batter, so that Vazquez would have to hit. The Pirates had a lead, and it was a given that they would leave Vazquez (who had entered in the 8th) in the game. Most of the time, there are fair arguments on both sides in baseball, but there was no valid case to be made against the intentional walk here. Unfortunately, Callaway chose not to walk the guy. That was bad.
Throw in times when Callaway has botched double-switches and the time when the Mets batted out of order, and one can make a strong case that Callaway is bad with strategy. (I will admit that the “batting out of order” thing is a bit of a Rorschach test. Had a good manager like Joe Maddon or Bruce Bochy overseen this gaffe, we would have laughed but not blamed the manager. However, because it happened to Callaway, we assume that it was Callaway’s fault.)
As for leadership, I think Callaway is in worse standing there than he is with strategy. It is conceivable that Callaway can improve from a strategic standpoint. After all, he was previously a pitching coach in the American League; thus, the bulk of National League strategy was irrelevant to him in years’ past. Unfortunately, leadership is a more difficult ability to change – typically you are either a good leader, or you are not.
Let us be clear. I very very rarely criticize a manager’s (coach’s) leadership in any sport. I think it is laughable when fans say things like, “The manager/coach has clearly lost the clubhouse/locker room”….as if we have any idea what is going on in those rooms. These critics are the people who see a physical error and blame the manager. Seriously, when the Yankees were 5-5 in April, I heard a guy call WFAN and claim that Aaron Boone was a bad manager because someone on the Yankees (I think it was Gregorious, but I am not certain) had made an error. If I ever get to the point where I blame individual physical errors on the manager, please euthanize me.
However, it is reasonable both to blame managers for players’ mental errors and to believe a players-turned-announcer’s analysis that a manager has “lost the team”. This is where Callaway finds himself in deep trouble. I have never heard the Mets’ TV announcers – Gary, Keith, and Ron – show the same amount of disdain for a manager that they do for Mickey Callaway. The disdain is never directly stated, but it is obvious. A textbook example came during Wednesday’s 5-3 Mets loss in D.C. Jose Bautista swung and missed for Strike Three, and the ball bounced to the backstop. Bautista did not run and was called out. Gary Cohen voiced his displeasure for Bautista’s stationary response, and Darling responded by saying that he was not surprised. Darling explained that the Mets have not run out dropped third strikes all year long. During Cohen’s and Darling’s dialogue, the disdain was obvious by the tones of their voices.
Similarly, a few weeks ago, Keith Hernandez appeared on Mike Francesa’s show. Francesa asked Keith if he thought Callaway was a good manager, and, in standard Francesa form, the question was long-winded and insinuated Francesa’s thoughts that Callaway was overmatched (either leadership-wise or strategically). Keith responded with only “I expect Mickey to be the Mets’ manager next year.” It was the ultimate case of “If you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all.” A damning comment from Keith….and yes, one that runs contrary to the basic premise of this article.
Anyway, the Mets have made many mental errors this year, such as Wilmer Flores not throwing home in Wednesday’s eighth inning. Unlike with physical errors, a mental mistake is at least partially the manager’s fault. A manager should do his best to ensure that all players know what to do in all situations. Of course, players can make mental errors even if the manager has adequately prepared them to do the right thing. Unfortunately, there have been too many mental errors for this year’s Mets for one not to wonder if the manager is partially to blame. There have also been too many times when the Mets do not hustle. Again, for that, it is fair to look toward the manager.
Does this mean that Callaway has lost the clubhouse? On my own, I cannot say that. However, there have been enough allusions from Gary, Keith, Ron, and even Nelson Figueroa (SNY Studio) that Callaway has no control over the team. 3 of those 4 were Major Leaguers, and the other has been around Mets teams for 30 years. When they say that Callaway has “lost the team”, I believe them.
2) The Mets need a scapegoat for this awful season. If a team has an unexpectedly terrible season, there usually needs to be a scapegoat. As the old adage goes, you cannot fire the whole team, but you can fire the manager. Note that I wrote “unexpectedly” in the first sentence of this part. The Mets lost 92 games last year, which is terrible. When a team has a terrible season, it is usually reasonable to expect the next season to be terrible as well. Fairly or not, though, most people viewed the 2018 Mets differently.
While people were not readily predicting the 2018 Mets to be a playoff team, most people assumed that 2017 would prove to be an aberration because Yoenis Cespedes and the Mets’ starting-pitching staff minus Jacob deGrom spent most of 2017 on the disabled list. Therefore, it seemed reasonable that the 2018 Mets would be at least a .500 team and would be in the running for the second Wild Card. Unfortunately for Callaway, Cespedes will end up spending most of 2018 on the DL as well, and the stats since the start of 2015 show that the Mets are much much better with Cespedes than without him. At the same time, deGrom, Steven Matz, and Zack Wheeler have essentially been healthy all year to this point. Noah Syndergaard has been healthy for 2 of the 4 months. Seth Lugo has been healthy as well, and he made a few starts early in the season before moving effectively to the bullpen.
In a way, Callaway has actually been hurt by the fact that the starting pitching has done well this year. We all hoped that the Mets’ pitchers would be better and healthier this year than last year, and that has been the case. Therefore, the fact that this pitching success has led the Mets to a 44-61 record ends up making it worse on Callaway than if the pitchers had all been terrible. Had the pitchers been terrible and/or hurt, we would likely be blaming the pitchers (who were terrible and/or hurt last year, pre-Callaway).
Many modern “Moneyball” people say that a manager does not matter. I am a moderate in this debate. When a team is 44-61 as the Mets are, not even Gil Hodges nor Tony LaRussa would not have made the team a playoff team. The Mets are terrible primarily because they have bad players – especially position players. That said, I think that the difference between a good manager and a bad manager is somewhere between 6 and 10 wins over a full season. While any manager can and should rely primarily on all available statistics to guide his decisions, a good manager is also able to take advantage of knowledge like: which reliever says he has “good stuff” today, which batter had great batting practice today, which normally-good player is in a funk today because of a fight with his girlfriend, which player is feeling sick today, etc. A good manager rarely loses games because his players make mental errors or do not hustle. A good manager’s tough decisions end up correct more often than not.
It would seem that none of the previous paragraph applies to Callaway. Thus, given that we are 2/3 of the way through the season, maybe the Mets would have 6 more wins with a better manager. That would mean a 50-55 record, which is actually a world of difference from 44-61. It would give the Mets a chance to finish over .500. More importantly, it would make the Mets feel that they are on the way back after the disastrous 70-92 2017 season.
I would love for the Mets to sign Manny Machado next year, but I know it is not happening. The Wilpons can try to sign several players who will make the Mets much better in 2018, or they can bring in a new manager. If the Wilpons do the latter, they can preach a change of culture, accountability, etc. Which option is better? I would absolutely prefer better players, because that can make more than 6 to 10 wins worth of difference. However, which is cheaper? Bringing in a new manager. That is the biggest reason why I expect a new manager in 2018.
3) The Mets wreck their managers by not letting them appear on WFAN or ESPN Radio. This needs to be said. Most Mets fans think of Mickey Callaway as a buffoon, partially because we never get to hear our trusted sports-radio hosts – Francesa, Kay, LaGreca, Evan Roberts, Boomer, etc. – interview the guy. The Mets do not let their personnel speak on radio stations other than 710 WOR, and, in so doing, they set up their managers for failure. If we were able to hear Callaway be interviewed on a weekly basis, we would hear his answers to some of our questions. Oftentimes, we think people are misguided until we hear them provide their actual rationales. Unfortunately, we do not get this air time with Callaway. All we get is plenty of hosts deservedly ridiculing him for saying, “We are going to love our players…”. This is why Callaway could truly benefit from first-hand WFAN/ESPN Radio time.
OK, maybe Callaway would not give us much more in hypothetical WFAN/ESPN interviews than he gives us in his postgame press conferences, but there is a multiplier effect in play. Radio hosts are nicer when discussing people who are guests on the show than when discussing people who are not. It is human nature. This does not mean that the radio hosts have not spoken ill of Joe Girardi nor Aaron Boone at times. However, hosts will give those guys the benefit of the doubt, because they have working relationships that lead the hosts to assume the best from the managers. When have you heard any sports-radio personality give Callaway the benefit of the doubt? It never happens, because the hosts do not have relationships with the guy. This hurts Callaway. There is never any positivity about Mickey Callaway when it comes to sports radio, and that influences fans’ perceptions. The Mets ensure that their managers receive primarily negative radio coverage. Not only is this bad for Callaway, but it will also hurt his replacement as Mets manager in 2019.
I know that Keith expects Callaway to be back next year, but I think this post is way too long for that to be the case.