Three Penalty Rules That the NFL Should Change

I admit it, I admit it.  I was wrong.  I hate being wrong, and I hate having to admit being wrong…but I will do so when necessary.  At the start of the season, I made a rambling post about how great the NFL is and how the ratings decline was nothing more a reflection of our struggle to measure media consumption in the current world.  My friend, Matt, contested that the incessant long replays and frequency of penalties had legitimately hurt interest in the NFL.  I disagreed with him at the time, but, after a full season to reflect, I know that Matt was right…and I was wrong.

Way too often, the excitement of a thrilling play is dampened by an unnecessary 5-minute review.  Way too often, we keep seeing ticky-tack penalties take away big plays or cause major changes in field position and in the control of the game.  The NFL needs to clean this up.  I have already spoken of my desires to cap replay reviews at one minute in length and allow coaches to challenge penalties.  That said, there are three additional changes that the league needs to make to its penalty system.  Let us now run through them:

  • Pass interference should default to a 15-yard penalty, with an option for a flagrant penalty. We see way too many cases of quarterbacks chucking up 40-yard passes and hoping for (and earning) pass-interference calls.  For example, on Sunday, AJ Bouye clearly committed pass interference on this play, but it does not seem to me that the Pats deserved to gain 40 yards of field position because of it.  Without the interference, it remains quite unlikely that Brandin Cooks hauls in Tom Brady’s pass.  Therefore, the 40-yard penalty late in the second quarter was a major game-changer that did not feel right to any unbiased observer.  The Pats started that play at the Jags’ 45, and the penalty put New England at the end zone’s doorstep.  The Pats ultimately scored the touchdown to pull within 14-10.

The better result would have been a 15-yard penalty.  This would have given the Patriots a first down at the Jags’ 30, but it would have not have moved them so close to a touchdown.  This would have made it more likely that the Jags would have held the Pats to a field goal.  The 15-yard penalty is a punishment that fits the crime.  Furthermore, I think that, when many quarterbacks heave deep balls, they do so looking solely for PI calls.  In these cases, the QBs often have little expectation that their receivers will catch said passes.  I think that this penalty change would decrease this practice a bit.

Image result for pass interference nfl

At the same time, I know, I know, I know the counterargument to my proposal.  The counterargument to my point is, “But wouldn’t defensive backs just start tackling wide receivers?”  Well, most of the time, interference occurs because the defensive and offensive players are close to each other.  That fact alone shows that, without interference, the defender could have contested the pass.  Thus, without the penalty, it also would not have been an easy catch for the receiver.  Furthermore, if you ask a quarterback, “Would you rather have a sure 15-yard PI call or the chance for your receiver to beat a DB for a 40-yard catch, what would you choose?”  Most coaches would choose the former: the sure first down and 15-yard gain.

That all said, I would allow officials to have the right to call “flagrant pass interference” if the PI prevents a “sure, long reception”.  In other words, if a DB trips a receiver who is blowing past him for a potential wide-open and deep reception, that can be considered a spot foul as we see with the current rule.  However, officials are to reserve that call for the most obvious and flagrant of PI calls.  In my mind, that should satisfy people who worry that DBs would have motivation to tackle people left and right.

  • “Unsportsmanlike Conduct/Unnecessary Roughness/Face Mask” should be broken into two categories – 5-yard penalties and 15-yard penalties. Yes, in olden days this was how the “face-mask” penalty went.  If a player touched the mask but did not grab hold of it, the penalty was a 5-yarder with no automatic first down.  However, if a player pulled on the mask, it was a 15-yarder and an automatic first down.  This rule made perfect sense.  Usually, the NHL, not the NFL, is the league that gets rid of things that make perfect sense.  Thus, Gary Bettman should be proud of the NFL for making all facemask penalties 15-yarders.  It makes no sense. The NFL got rid of a rule that made perfect sense!  Granted, I am pretty sure that this rule change was made so that officials had one fewer thing about which to worry.  I do not care though.  Officials should be able to handle the decision between a 5-yarder and a 15-yarder.  Simply put, 15-yard penalties drastically alter games, so a 15-yard facemask penalty should come only from something fragrant.

Image result for facemask penalty

This same metric should be applied to all “Unnecessary Roughness” calls.   I get it – if a DB sprints head-first into a receiver’s head, that should be a 15-yarder.  If a lineman body slams a QB 3 seconds after releasing the ball, that too should be a 15-yarder.  However, if a defensive player is trying to make a clean hit only to have the ball carrier move his head into the hit at the last second, should that really be 15 yards???  No, 5 yards and no automatic first down should suffice.  Likewise, for the 350-pound lineman running full speed and having to stop on a dime when the QB releases the ball….let us give that guy 2 or 3 seconds before it is a 15-yard penalty.  If it is a late hit but only 1-1.5 seconds after the QB throws the pass, a 5-yard penalty seems fair to me.

  • “Defensive holding” should not be an automatic first down. This penalty is not interference.  This is a case of a defensive player obstructing a wide receiver when the ball is not on its way. Therefore, a 5-yard penalty with a replay of down seems more than adequate in the punishment department.  I do not understand why a hold on 3rd and 15 should automatically give a team a first down.  Maybe in an era when penalties were called less frequently, that rule would have made sense.  However, we do not live in that era.  I agree with Jon Gruden when he says, “The penalty should call itself”.  In other words, I wish that the refs would let the guys play and call only major penalties.  However, the game is not called this way right now.  We see “defensive holding” penalties called all the time. Therefore, let us knock that penalty down to 5 yards, and we will get rid of silly, undeserved first downs.  When a defensive player commits holding, the offense would continue to reap the benefits of 5 yards and a replay of the down.  That is an appropriate punishment for the crime and reward for the offense.

 Roger Goodell, I hope you listen to me.  If not, I am sure Vince McMahon would love to listen to my ideas!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s